For a medical laboratory, maintaining accurate testing, consistent processes, and dependable patient results is essential. ISO 15189 Accreditation provides an internationally recognized framework for demonstrating a medical laboratory’s technical competence and quality management practices.
For laboratories approaching accreditation for the first time, the requirements can appear extensive. A clear understanding of the laboratory accreditation process, documentation, technical requirements, and assessment stages can make preparation more systematic.
This guide covers the major aspects of ISO 15189 accreditation, the importance of ISO 15189:2022, and the practical steps a medical laboratory can take before applying for accreditation.
What Is ISO 15189 Accreditation?
ISO 15189 is an international standard developed specifically for medical laboratories. It combines quality management requirements with technical competence requirements applicable to medical laboratory activities.
ISO 15189:2022, the current edition of the standard, addresses several important areas, including:
Quality management and laboratory operations
Competence of laboratory personnel
Equipment and infrastructure
Examination procedures
Sample collection, identification, and handling
Verification and validation of examination methods
Internal quality control
Risk management
Reporting of laboratory results
Management of nonconformities
Continual improvement
Accreditation against ISO 15189 demonstrates that a laboratory has established controlled processes and systems intended to support technically valid and reliable examination results.
Why Is ISO 15189:2022 Important for Medical Laboratories?
Laboratory test results can have a direct role in diagnosis, treatment decisions, and patient management. For this reason, an effective laboratory quality system needs to address both documentation and actual day-to-day practices.
ISO 15189:2022 gives significant attention to risk-based thinking, patient-focused services, personnel competence, and consistent examination processes. Proper implementation can help laboratories strengthen traceability, reduce process-related errors, improve documentation, and increase confidence in laboratory results.
For this reason, medical lab accreditation can support both compliance and the continuous improvement of laboratory operations.
Who Needs Clinical Lab Accreditation?
Clinical lab accreditation applies to laboratories involved in medical examinations and diagnostic testing. Depending on their scope of activities, these may include:
Pathology laboratories
Clinical chemistry laboratories
Hematology laboratories
Microbiology laboratories
Molecular diagnostic laboratories
Immunology laboratories
Histopathology laboratories
Hospital-based medical laboratories
Independent diagnostic laboratories
Laboratories seeking clinical laboratory accreditation in India should first understand the requirements applicable to their activities. They should then establish the necessary management and technical systems before undergoing an assessment.
ISO 15189 Accreditation vs Other Laboratory Accreditation
A common issue for first-time applicants is assuming that the same accreditation standard applies to every type of laboratory.
The applicable standard generally depends on the laboratory activity and the scope for which accreditation is being sought.
Therefore, testing lab accreditation, medical device testing lab accreditation, and calibration lab accreditation should not be considered the same as medical laboratory accreditation.
The appropriate standard should be determined according to the laboratory's activities and proposed accreditation scope.
Understanding Accreditation Bodies for Medical Laboratories
An accreditation body assesses whether a laboratory meets the relevant standard and demonstrates the competence required for its defined scope.
When evaluating accreditation bodies for medical laboratories, organizations may consider several factors, such as:
Applicable accreditation standard
Proposed accreditation scope
Assessment procedures
Recognition arrangements
Competence of assessors
Application and accreditation procedures
Surveillance and reassessment requirements
Transparency of the accreditation process
Choosing an appropriate accreditation body is an important part of the initial planning stage because it determines how the application and assessment process will be handled.
The Laboratory Accreditation Process: Step by Step
For a first-time applicant, the laboratory accreditation process can be approached through a series of practical steps.
1. Understand the Standard
The first step is to study ISO 15189:2022 and determine which requirements apply to the laboratory's activities and proposed scope.
The standard should not be treated simply as a documentation requirement. Its requirements need to be reflected in the laboratory's actual working processes.
2. Define the Scope
The laboratory should clearly identify the examinations and activities for which accreditation is being requested.
A well-defined scope helps the laboratory determine its requirements for personnel, equipment, examination methods, quality controls, facilities, and technical records.
3. Conduct a Gap Assessment
The laboratory should compare its current practices with the applicable requirements of ISO 15189:2022.
A gap assessment can highlight areas that need attention, including:
Missing or incomplete procedures
Inadequate records
Personnel competency gaps
Equipment management issues
Quality-control weaknesses
Method verification or validation requirements
Risk management deficiencies
Document-control issues
Resolving these gaps before the formal assessment can improve the laboratory's level of preparedness.
4. Establish the Quality Management System
The laboratory should develop and implement a quality management system that reflects its real operations.
Depending on the laboratory's activities, this may include procedures and records related to document control, personnel management, equipment, purchasing, sample handling, examination processes, quality indicators, nonconformities, corrective actions, internal audits, management reviews, and continual improvement.
The objective should be an effective working system rather than documentation created only for the assessment.
5. Demonstrate Technical Competence
Documentation by itself does not demonstrate laboratory competence.
The laboratory should be able to demonstrate that its personnel are competent, equipment is properly managed, examination methods are appropriate, and technical processes are supported by suitable quality-control evidence.
Where applicable, the laboratory should also address method verification or validation, measurement uncertainty, reference materials, proficiency testing, and traceability.
6. Implement Internal Audits
Internal audits help determine whether the laboratory's management and technical processes are being implemented as intended.
Relevant requirements and laboratory activities should be covered. Audit findings should be recorded, investigated, and addressed through suitable corrective actions.
7. Conduct Management Review
Management review allows laboratory leadership to evaluate the performance and effectiveness of the quality management system.
The review may include:
Internal audit findings
Complaints
Quality indicators
Nonconformities
Corrective actions
Risks and opportunities
Resource requirements
Personnel performance
Opportunities for improvement
This process can help management identify areas that require further attention before or after accreditation.
8. Apply for Accreditation
After the required management and technical systems have been implemented, the laboratory can submit its application and supporting information to the selected accreditation body.
The accreditation body reviews the submitted information and proceeds with the assessment according to its established procedures.
9. Prepare for Assessment
Assessment involves more than reviewing laboratory documents.
Assessors may examine records, interview personnel, observe laboratory activities, review equipment and facilities, and evaluate technical processes included within the proposed scope.
The laboratory should therefore ensure that documented procedures correspond with actual practices.
10. Address Nonconformities
If nonconformities are identified during assessment, the laboratory needs to investigate the underlying causes and implement appropriate corrective actions.
Addressing only the immediate error may not be sufficient. The laboratory should also determine why the issue occurred and identify measures that can reduce the possibility of recurrence.
11. Accreditation Decision
After the assessment process and satisfactory resolution of applicable findings, the accreditation body follows its established decision-making procedure.
Once accreditation is granted, the laboratory remains responsible for maintaining its management system, technical competence, and conformity with applicable requirements.
Also read: ISO 15189 Accreditation for Medical Laboratories: Why the Right Accreditation Partner Matters
Common Challenges for First-Time Applicants
First-time applicants may face difficulties when documentation receives more attention than actual implementation.
Some commonly encountered areas include:
Procedures that differ from actual laboratory practices
Incomplete personnel competency records
Insufficient equipment maintenance documentation
Missing or incomplete quality-control records
Weak internal audit processes
Inadequate corrective-action investigations
Unclear accreditation scope
Incomplete method verification or validation
Gaps in risk management
Limited management involvement
An effective medical lab accreditation program requires coordination between laboratory management, technical personnel, and other relevant staff.
How FDASIndia Can Support Your Accreditation Journey
For laboratories preparing for ISO 15189 accreditation, a structured implementation approach can make the accreditation journey more organized.
FDASIndia operates as an accreditation body for laboratories and maintains a management system aligned with ISO/IEC 17011:2017. Its accreditation activities include relevant laboratory accreditation requirements, including medical laboratories under ISO 15189 and testing and calibration laboratories under applicable standards.
FDASIndia became an APAC MRA Signatory in June 2023 and an ILAC MRA Signatory in August 2023 for testing and calibration laboratory accreditation.
For organizations evaluating accreditation bodies for medical laboratories, understanding the applicable standard, scope, assessment requirements, and accreditation pathway is an important part of the initial planning process.
Final Thoughts
Beginning the ISO 15189 accreditation journey becomes more manageable when the laboratory approaches each requirement systematically.
Understanding ISO 15189:2022, defining an appropriate scope, implementing a practical quality management system, demonstrating technical competence, conducting internal audits, and preparing for assessment are all important parts of the process.
Whether a laboratory is planning clinical laboratory accreditation in India, strengthening an existing quality system, or applying for ISO 15189 accreditation for the first time, proper preparation can help identify gaps and create a more structured accreditation process.
Ready to begin your ISO 15189 journey? Contact FDASIndia for information about medical laboratory accreditation and the accreditation process.
